On 3/1/21 7:16 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 3/1/21 8:49 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
>> index 05cebc8597..e18d475572 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
>> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
>> @@ -292,21 +292,15 @@ vaddr arm_adjust_watchpoint_address(CPUState *cs, 
>> vaddr addr, int len);
>>   /* Callback function for when a watchpoint or breakpoint triggers. */
>>   void arm_debug_excp_handler(CPUState *cs);
>>   
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) || !defined(CONFIG_TCG)
>> -static inline bool arm_is_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu, int excp_type)
>> -{
>> -    return false;
>> -}
>> -static inline void arm_handle_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu)
>> -{
>> -    g_assert_not_reached();
>> -}
>> -#else
> 
> I don't see that removing this ifdef...
> 
>> @@ -10040,11 +10040,13 @@ void arm_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
>>                         env->exception.syndrome);
>>       }
>>   
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>       if (arm_is_psci_call(cpu, cs->exception_index)) {
>>           arm_handle_psci_call(cpu);
>>           qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...handled as PSCI call\n");
>>           return;
>>       }
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
> 
> ... is an improvement on adding this one.  Just leave the static inline stub 
> alone.  At some point you move the do_interrupt pieces, and the stubs can be 
> removed completely, perhaps?
> 
> 
> r~
> 

Yes, agreed.

Thanks, C

Reply via email to