On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 12:28:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il mar 2 feb 2021, 00:05 Eduardo Habkost <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:59:48PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > Il lun 1 feb 2021, 23:54 Eduardo Habkost <[email protected]> ha > > scritto: > > > > > > > Not having a feature name in feature_word_info breaks error > > > > reporting and query-cpu-model-expansion. Add the missing feature > > > > name to feature_word_info[FEAT_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAPS].feat_names[14]. > > > > > > > This is intentional, because there's no way that any hypervisor can run > > if > > > this feature is disabled. > > > > If leaving the feature without name enables some desirable > > behavior, that's by accident and not by design. Which part of > > the existing behavior is intentional? > > > > Not being able to disable it.
We can make it a hard dependency of vmx, then. We shouldn't leave it without a name, though. -- Eduardo
