Hi Vitaly, I just wanted to raise awareness of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-11/msg04597.html
because if that series work is completed, you would have already the right hook to put your code in, when it comes to your hyperv-specific code for the realizefn. Ciao ciao, Claudio On 11/19/20 11:32 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > This series is a part of the previously sent "[PATCH RFC v3 00/23] i386: > KVM: expand Hyper-V features early": > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-10/msg02443.html > > We're not ready to merge the full patch set yet because the required > KVM capability is only queued for 5.11. We can, however, extract the > part providing 'hyperv=on' option to x86 machine types which is valuable > on its own. Picking up four other patches from the original RFC to > minimize the code churn in future (x86_cpu_realizefn()). > > Changes since RFCv3: > - Rename 'hyperv_features' to 'default_hyperv_features' in X86MachineClass > [Eduardo] > - Move x86_cpu_hyperv_realize() invocation after x86_cpu_expand_features()/ > x86_cpu_filter_features() as we need to reference cpu_has_vmx(). > > Vitaly Kuznetsov (5): > i386: move hyperv_vendor_id initialization to x86_cpu_realizefn() > i386: move hyperv_interface_id initialization to x86_cpu_realizefn() > i386: move hyperv_version_id initialization to x86_cpu_realizefn() > i386: move hyperv_limits initialization to x86_cpu_realizefn() > i386: provide simple 'hyperv=on' option to x86 machine types > > docs/hyperv.txt | 8 +++++ > hw/i386/x86.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ > include/hw/i386/x86.h | 7 +++++ > target/i386/cpu.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > target/i386/cpu.h | 6 +++- > target/i386/kvm.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 6 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >
