Ping ... On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:51 PM Ani Sinha <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:22 PM Eduardo Habkost <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:03:25PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > Object property insertion code iterates over an integer to get an > unused > > > index that can be used as an unique name for an object property. This > loop > > > increments the integer value indefinitely. Although very unlikely, > this can > > > still cause an integer overflow. > > > In this change, we fix the above code by checking against INT16_MAX > and making > > > sure that the interger index does not overflow beyond that value. If no > > > available index is found, the code would cause an assertion failure. > This > > > assertion failure is necessary because the callers of the function do > not check > > > the return value for NULL. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <[email protected]> > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> > > > > Queued on machine-next, thanks! My apologies for the delay. > > Any idea when this will be pulled? >
