From: Thomas Huth <[email protected]> When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code, the fallthrough is very likely intended here, so add some comments to silence the compiler warnings.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]> Message-id: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> --- hw/arm/highbank.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/arm/highbank.c b/hw/arm/highbank.c index da0510d7cef..f71087860d0 100644 --- a/hw/arm/highbank.c +++ b/hw/arm/highbank.c @@ -92,10 +92,12 @@ static void hb_reset_secondary(ARMCPU *cpu, const struct arm_boot_info *info) address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x30, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL); + /* fallthrough */ case 3: address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x20, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL); + /* fallthrough */ case 2: address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x10, 0, -- 2.20.1
