[ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11686919/ ]
Ping? This patch got lost somewhere. Should I try to apply it via trivial tree? I've more cleanups pending for this area. Just in case, I verified this patch it wih xen 4.4 and with current xen, and with current qemu, - no part of qemu uses xenguest interface. Thanks, /mjt 27.07.2020 18:20, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 27.07.2020 18:09, Anthony PERARD wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:00:48PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> There's no references in only file which includes xenguest.h >>> to any xen definitions. And there's no references to -lxenguest >>> in qemu, either. Drop it. >> >> I'm not sure what you mean by "no references to -lxenguest", do you mean >> in the binary? > > Yes, in the qemu-system-i386 binary, it can be linked without -lxenguest. > > Just a caveat, -- I know almost nothing about xen, especially xen > internals and its (stable, unversioned and unstable, versioned) libs. > Qemu links fine without libxenguest in the mix with xen 4.11.4, - I > can't say for other versions. I just thought if it does not include > <xenguest.h>, why it should link with -lxenguest? :)
