On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:27 PM Richard Henderson <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/14/20 11:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Looks good. Can you just add a "# Submodules" heading above the test?
> >
> > I would also like to remove the "yes" value (that is, the default fails
> if the
> > internal copy is not there) but it can be done later for all submodules.
>
> Unless you simply plan to rename {no, yes} to {disabled, enabled}, as for
> the
> Feature objects, why?
>
> That seems to be the only sensible value for --enable-foo, without the
> =system
> or =git specifiers. We *should* fail if no system library nor internal
> copy is
> present.
>
I suggest remove the capstone=system option cause the system library may
not satisfy the requirements of qemu
and create in-consistence expereince when bug or error happens about
capstone. We either have git submodule capstone
or nothing at all
>
>
> r~
>
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
