On 08/21/20 16:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 21/08/20 16:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 08/21/20 15:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>> https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Meson/Next has a summary of changes
>>> and is worth a quick scan through.
>>
>> I'd like to propose a wording clarification:
>>
>> """
>> For bisection: incremental builds work fine in the forward direction.
>> They probably don't work at all backwards. This is mitigated by the fact
>> that bisection usually starts at a release, and the patches should be
>> applied on top of the 5.1.0 tag.
>> """
>>
>> namely:
>>
>> - s/forward direction/forward direction, across the conversion/
>> - s/backwards/backwards, across the conversion/
>>
>> Because the way the paragraph is worded now, it suggests that *any*
>> individual bisection step that moves backwards in the git history will
>> not build. That would be of course catastrophic. We should clarify that
>> the symptom is limited to steps that straddle the conversion commit range.
>>
>> If the suggested replacements are OK, I can make the edit myself (if
>> that's preferred).
>>
>> (Not trying to be a busybody -- exactly because I contribute little to
>> QEMU, bisection is a comparatively large part of what I *do* do with QEMU.)
> 
> That's fine! I made a small adjustment and you're free to improve
> further on the wording.

Thanks a lot, the new text reads great!
Laszlo


Reply via email to