On 19/08/20 23:59, Eric Blake wrote: > On 8/19/20 4:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> The following changes since commit >> d0ed6a69d399ae193959225cdeaa9382746c91cc: >> >> Update version for v5.1.0 release (2020-08-11 17:07:03 +0100) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu.git tags/for-upstream > > Unrelated to the pull request proper, but I note in MAINTAINERS that you > have listed: > > T: git https://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git scsi-next > > Have you switched to gitlab as your personal mirroring preference, and > if so, should MAINTAINERS be updated?
Yes, but also I've not used a scsi-next branch for years. :) >> for you to fetch changes up to 2eddb3c65821dce76433d5da6f3e6419349d1b77: >> >> docs: convert build system documentation to rST (2020-08-19 >> 16:13:30 -0400) >> >> v6->v7: >> * new patch to preserve compatibility symlinks from previous binary >> locations >> * fixed cut-and-paste error in linux-user/mips/meson.build >> * preserve compatibility check-block target even if no block tests are >> defined > > FWIW: I haven't done any review or testing of the earlier iterations of > this series. But since it will be landing soon, I merged this tag to an > incremental build tree that was previously sitting on a finished 5.1 > build (sources in qemu/, VPATH build in qemu/build/), typed 'make' then > 'make check', and everything finished successfully at least for my > typical setup. So good job on getting this massive rewrite in while > still preserving at least the common 'make' interface. I must admit I was a bit lazy with incremental builds until Peter pressed me for it, and I must say it wasn't _that_ hard to do, with a fresh mind. I tried a bunch of touch&&make scenarios and they all worked fine. It always helps to steal tricks from Autoconf's bag, since QEMU's "./config.status --skip-meson" is basically the same as Autoconf's "./config.status --recheck". Paolo
