On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 14:24, Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/6/20 3:20 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Various fixes improving the support of Aspeed machines. > > > > Thanks, > > > > C. > > > > Cédric Le Goater (16): > > m25p80: Return the JEDEC ID twice for mx25l25635e > > m25p80: Add support for mx25l25635f > > m25p80: Add support for n25q512ax3 > > aspeed/scu: Fix valid access size on AST2400 > > aspeed/smc: Fix MemoryRegionOps definition > > aspeed/smc: Fix max_slaves of the legacy SMC device > > aspeed/sdhci: Fix reset sequence > > ftgmac100: Fix registers that can be read > > ftgmac100: Fix interrupt status "Packet transmitted on ethernet" > > ftgmac100: Fix interrupt status "Packet moved to RX FIFO" > > ftgmac100: Change interrupt status when a DMA error occurs > > ftgmac100: Check for invalid len and address before doing a DMA > > transfer > > ftgmac100: Fix integer overflow in ftgmac100_do_tx() > > ftgmac100: Improve software reset > > aspeed/sdmc: Simplify calculation of RAM bits > > aspeed/smc: Open AHB window of the second chip of the AST2600 FMC > > controller > > > > Joel Stanley (2): > > aspeed/sdmc: Perform memory training > > aspeed/sdmc: Allow writes to unprotected registers > > > > erik-smit (1): > > hw/arm/aspeed: Add board model for Supermicro X11 BMC > > Peter, > > I saw that you just merged that one. I did some minor changes in > the commit log. Nothing very important.
OK, I'll drop the old version from target-arm.next. I'm wondering whether it would be simpler to let you just submit pullreqs for aspeed-specific patches, since we seem to have quite a lot of them and I'm generally letting you do the review work anyway. What do you think ? I'm happy to continue to take them in via target-arm.next if you prefer. thanks -- PMM
