On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:48 AM Zong Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The range of Physical Memory Protection should be from CSR_PMPCFG0
> to CSR_PMPCFG3, not to CSR_PMPADDR9.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <[email protected]>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/csr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
> index ac01c835e1..6a96a01b1c 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
> @@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ static riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = {
>      [CSR_MTINST] =              { hmode,   read_mtinst,      write_mtinst    
>  },
>
>      /* Physical Memory Protection */
> -    [CSR_PMPCFG0  ... CSR_PMPADDR9] =  { pmp,   read_pmpcfg,  write_pmpcfg   
> },
> +    [CSR_PMPCFG0  ... CSR_PMPCFG3]   = { pmp,   read_pmpcfg,  write_pmpcfg   
> },
>      [CSR_PMPADDR0 ... CSR_PMPADDR15] = { pmp,   read_pmpaddr, write_pmpaddr  
> },
>
>      /* Performance Counters */
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>

Reply via email to