On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 09:51, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 5/29/20 8:23 AM, Robert Foley wrote: > > From: Lingfeng Yang <l...@google.com> > > > > We tried running QEMU under tsan in 2016, but tsan's lack of support for > > longjmp-based fibers was a blocker: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/thread-sanitizer/se0YuzfWazw > > [meta-comment] > > This message lacked References: and In-Reply-To: headers, making it the > start of a new thread for patches 1-11. But I also see you sent a 0/12 > message with Message-Id: <20200529132143.702-1-robert.fo...@linaro.org>, > as well as an unthreaded 12/12 with Message-Id: > <20200529132438.837-1-robert.fo...@linaro.org>. You may want to figure > out why your sending workflow is not preserving desired threading.
Thanks for pointing this out. I see what happened here and will fix it for next time. Thanks, -Rob > -- > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 > Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org >