Gentle ping.

Any other suggestions about this?

Thanks.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chenqun (kuhn)
>Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 11:29 AM
>To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>Cc: Zhanghailiang <[email protected]>; Chenqun (kuhn)
><[email protected]>; Euler Robot <[email protected]>;
>Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>; Ronnie Sahlberg
><[email protected]>; Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>; Peter
>Lieven <[email protected]>; Max Reitz <[email protected]>; Laurent Vivier
><[email protected]>
>Subject: [PATCH v3] block/iscsi:use the flags in iscsi_open() prevent Clang
>warning
>
>Clang static code analyzer show warning:
>  block/iscsi.c:1920:9: warning: Value stored to 'flags' is never read
>        flags &= ~BDRV_O_RDWR;
>        ^        ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>In iscsi_allocmap_init() only checks BDRV_O_NOCACHE, which is the same in
>both of flags and bs->open_flags.
>We can use the flags instead bs->open_flags to prevent Clang warning.
>
>Reported-by: Euler Robot <[email protected]>
>Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <[email protected]>
>Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>
>---
>Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <[email protected]>
>Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
>Cc: Peter Lieven <[email protected]>
>Cc: Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>
>Cc: Max Reitz <[email protected]>
>Cc: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
>
>v1->v2:
> Keep the 'flags' then use it(Base on Kevin's comments).
>
>v2->v3:
> Modify subject and commit messages(Base on Kevin's and Laurent's
>comments).
>---
> block/iscsi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c index 682abd8e09..50bae51700 100644
>--- a/block/iscsi.c
>+++ b/block/iscsi.c
>@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static int iscsi_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
>*options, int flags,
>         iscsilun->cluster_size = iscsilun->bl.opt_unmap_gran *
>             iscsilun->block_size;
>         if (iscsilun->lbprz) {
>-            ret = iscsi_allocmap_init(iscsilun, bs->open_flags);
>+            ret = iscsi_allocmap_init(iscsilun, flags);
>         }
>     }
>
>--
>2.23.0
>

Reply via email to