On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:35:01 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 20.02.20 14:26, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 20.02.20 14:16, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> There is a special quiesce PSW that we check for "shutdown". Otherwise > >> disabled > >> wait is detected as "crashed". Architecturally we must only check PSW bits > >> 116-127. Fix this. > >> > >> Cc: [email protected] > > > > Is this really stable material? > > Guests that end with lets say 0xaafffUL would be considered "crashed" instead > of "shutdown". > I will let Conny decide. It cannot really hurt; but would be interesting if you have seen that in the wild. > > > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> > > >
