On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 12:33, Taylor Simpson <tsimp...@quicinc.com> wrote: > > I proposed a similar patch guarded by #ifdef TARGET_HEXAGON. I understand we > don't want to break things that are working, and we don't want to open the > door for a bunch of #ifdef's here. However, more than one scenario needs > this capability. > > Would a suitable compromise be to provide a hook in linux-user/signal.c for > the target to put in the changes they need?
No; this isn't target-specific, and we don't want per-target different behaviour. thanks -- PMM
