Thanks for your review. I will modify its according to your suggestions. -----Original Message----- From: Juan Quintela [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:19 PM To: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]> Cc: fengzhimin <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Zhanghailiang <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/12] migration: Add multiRDMA capability support
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]> wrote: > * Zhimin Feng ([email protected]) wrote: >> From: fengzhimin <[email protected]> >> >> Signed-off-by: fengzhimin <[email protected]> > > Instead of creating x-multirdma as a capability and the corresponding > parameter for the number of channels; it would be better just to use > the multifd parameters when used with an rdma transport; as far as I > know multifd doesn't work with rdma at the moment, and to the user the > idea of multifd over rdma is just the same thing. I was about to suggest that. We could setup both capabilities: multifd + rdma
