On 12/1/19 1:26 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/28/19 7:46 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> + if (qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_PAGE)) {
>> + qemu_log_lock();
>> + qemu_log("new page @ 0x"TARGET_ABI_FMT_lx" updates page map:\n",
>> start);
>> + log_page_dump();
>> + qemu_log_unlock();
>> + }
>
> Hmm. The language used here asserts a change, when we don't actually know
> that
> for a fact. It *probably* adds a new page, but it could be overwriting an old
> page. Can you find a better wording here?
Also, if you're going to do this, you might as well instrument munmap and
mremap as well. Otherwise we're missing transitions.
r~