On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 2:35 PM Peter Maydell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 10:23, Marc-André Lureau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:22 PM Peter Maydell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Did you test whether migration still works from a QEMU > > > version without this patch to one with it? (The migration > > > > Yes, I thought I did test correctly, but I realized testing with x86 > > isn't correct. > > > > So with arm/musicpal for ex, I can migrate from before->after, however > > after->before won't work. Is that ok? > > Broadly speaking, the only case where we care about not > breaking cross-version migration is where we have a versioned > machine type. So musicpal doesn't matter too much. Beyond > that, yes, generally before->after is more important than > after->before. I have a feeling Red Hat downstream cares about > after->before migration at least for x86 but you or your colleagues > would know that better than me :-) > > > > vmstate code is too complicated for me to be able to figure > > > out whether passing the 'dev' pointer makes a difference > > > to whot it names the state sections and whether the > > > 'qdev_set_legacy_instance_id' suffices to avoid problems.) > > > > I don't see a way to fix after->before, because the instance id is > > initially 0 with the new code, and the old code expect a different > > value. > > Can you explain how the instance ID stuff works? I was > expecting that the result of setting the legacy instance ID > would just be that the new version would always have > the older setting, so if it works for old->new it would also > work for new->old. But as I say I don't understand this bit > of the migration code.
>From what I understand, the alias_id is only used in savevm.c:find_se(), and thus can only be used to match against "legacy" instance id values. On new code, instance_id is generated incrementally from 0 with calculate_new_instance_id(), based on "qdev-path/vmsd-name". -- Marc-André Lureau
