On 22/10/2019 13.39, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Thomas Huth <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> As discussed here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>>>
>>> and here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
>>>
>>> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the
>>> "auto" group to get better iotest coverage during "make check".
>>>
>>> And once Max' "iotests: Add and use $SOCK_DIR" patch series has been
>>> merged, we can indeed enable these Python-based tests, too.
>>
>> Oh well, some Travis jobs are now running too long and hit the 50
>> minutes limit:
>>
>> https://travis-ci.com/huth/qemu/jobs/248158477
>>
>> ... so we either might need to remove some other iotests from the "auto"
>> group again, or change the Travis jobs to include less targets...
>>
>> That "clang + sanitizer" job was already running 45 minutes before my
>> change, so it was already close to the limit. So I'd suggest to change
>> it to include less targets. Opinions?
>
> Which one is clang with sanitizers? I think we only build softmmu for
> gcc + sanitizer at the moment.
I meant this one here:
- env:
- CONFIG="--target-list=${MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS} "
compiler: clang
before_script:
- ./configure ${CONFIG} --extra-cflags="-fsanitize=undefined
-Werror" || { cat config.log && exit 1; }
Thomas
