On 21/10/19 18:55, Peter Maydell wrote: > There's two parts to this: > (1) is what we say in LICENSE what we actually have in practice? > (answer: clearly "no") > (2) as a policy, do we want to be stricter about the license > for code contributed to tcg/ than to the rest of the codebase? > (which is what this patch is trying to flush out answers to) >
... and from these points of view, your patch is definitely an improvement. Paolo
