On 17/06/19 19:58, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Of course, this makes me think that maybe for the actual proper > solution, VM state change handlers should really be a feature that qdev > provides for devices. Then if a HBA doesn't have anything else to do, > the qdev core would just recurse into the children right away; if it has > something to do, it would disable the device after its children, and > re-enable it before the children.
This was more or less my reply to this version of the patch. :) Paolo
