Like Xu <[email protected]> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <[email protected]> > --- > include/hw/arm/virt.h | 2 +- > include/hw/boards.h | 8 ++++++++ > include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 +- > vl.c | 7 ++++++- > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h > index 507517c..724da0c 100644 > --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h > +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ typedef struct { > struct arm_boot_info bootinfo; > MemMapEntry *memmap; > const int *irqmap; > - int smp_cpus; > + unsigned int smp_cpus; This seem unrelated to the rest of the change. > void *fdt; > int fdt_size; <snip> > diff --git a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h > index 6065d9e..c0d7d7c 100644 > --- a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h > +++ b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ extern const char *keyboard_layout; > extern int win2k_install_hack; > extern int alt_grab; > extern int ctrl_grab; > -extern int smp_cpus; > +extern unsigned int smp_cpus; Along with this. Is this meant to align with what is currently defined as smp_cpus in vl.c? Maybe these changes should be rolled together with that before the patch to introduce the new topology structure? -- Alex Bennée
