On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:36:05 PDT (-0700), [email protected] wrote:
Machines with no maintainer, but at least one supporter: [...] = hw/riscv/sifive_e.c = Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Alistair Francis <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Sagar Karandikar <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Bastian Koppelmann <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) [email protected] (open list:RISC-V)= hw/riscv/sifive_u.c = Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Alistair Francis <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Sagar Karandikar <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Bastian Koppelmann <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) [email protected] (open list:RISC-V) = hw/riscv/spike.c = Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Alistair Francis <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Sagar Karandikar <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Bastian Koppelmann <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) [email protected] (open list:RISC-V) = hw/riscv/virt.c = Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Alistair Francis <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Sagar Karandikar <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) Bastian Koppelmann <[email protected]> (supporter:RISC-V) [email protected] (open list:RISC-V)
Is "maintainer" a higher level of support than "supporter"? If that's the case then I'm happy signing up to be a maintainer of these, as part of by job at SiFive is to make sure these work. Sorry, I'm not entirely sure how this all works -- from reading the top of the MAINTAINERS file it appears that "supported" is a higher level of support than "maintained".
