On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora <ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM > which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000 > RFC. Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk. > > v3: > - Updated if-else conditions to appropriately handle nwnames = 0. > > v2: > - Added check in v9fs_walk_complete as well. > > Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c | 7 +++++-- > hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
hw/virtio-9p.c I think you've submitted a patch against an internal tree that isn't upstream. Stefan
