On 03/03/2019 23:35, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 3/3/19 9:23 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> static inline void get_cpu_vsrh(TCGv_i64 dst, int n)
>> {
>> - if (n < 32) {
>> - get_fpr(dst, n);
>> - } else {
>> - get_avr64(dst, n - 32, true);
>> - }
>> + tcg_gen_ld_i64(dst, cpu_env, vsrh_offset(n));
>> }
>>
>> static inline void get_cpu_vsrl(TCGv_i64 dst, int n)
>> {
>> - if (n < 32) {
>> - get_vsrl(dst, n);
>> - } else {
>> - get_avr64(dst, n - 32, false);
>> - }
>> + tcg_gen_ld_i64(dst, cpu_env, vsrl_offset(n));
>> }
>>
>> static inline void set_cpu_vsrh(int n, TCGv_i64 src)
>> {
>> - if (n < 32) {
>> - set_fpr(n, src);
>> - } else {
>> - set_avr64(n - 32, src, true);
>> - }
>> + tcg_gen_st_i64(src, cpu_env, vsrh_offset(n));
>> }
>
> I think these ought to have a "high" parameter, like set/get_avr64.
Right, this is effectively the same discussion as in my previous email so I
suggest
we follow this up there.
ATB,
Mark.
