On 27/02/19 17:10, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 27.02.19 16:36, [email protected] wrote: >> Patchew URL: >> https://patchew.org/QEMU/[email protected]/ >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for >> more information: >> >> Message-id: [email protected] >> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const >> void *" in helper calls >> Type: series >> >> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === >> #!/bin/bash >> git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 >> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 >> git config --local diff.renames True >> git config --local diff.algorithm histogram >> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. >> === TEST SCRIPT END === >> >> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 >> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu >> * [new tag] patchew/[email protected] >> -> patchew/[email protected] >> * [new tag] >> patchew/[email protected] -> >> patchew/[email protected] >> * [new tag] >> patchew/[email protected] -> >> patchew/[email protected] >> Switched to a new branch 'test' >> >> === OUTPUT BEGIN === >> checkpatch.pl: no revisions returned for revlist '1' > > While patchew seems to be broken right now, I wonder why patches are > tested that are long upstream? Is this some leftover from fixing patchew?
Yes, Patchew is just catching up. :) Paolo
