On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:19:31PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>chardev::read() depends of what chardev::can_read() returns, move the
>assertion to can_read().
>
>Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
>Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
>---
> hw/usb/ccid-card-passthru.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/hw/usb/ccid-card-passthru.c b/hw/usb/ccid-card-passthru.c
>index 0a6c657228..8bb1314f49 100644
>--- a/hw/usb/ccid-card-passthru.c
>+++ b/hw/usb/ccid-card-passthru.c
>@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static int ccid_card_vscard_can_read(void *opaque)
> {
>     PassthruState *card = opaque;
> 
>-    return VSCARD_IN_SIZE >= card->vscard_in_pos ?
>-           VSCARD_IN_SIZE - card->vscard_in_pos : 0;
>+    assert(card->vscard_in_pos <= VSCARD_IN_SIZE);

Do you have special reason change "<" to "<="?

>+    return VSCARD_IN_SIZE - card->vscard_in_pos;
> }
> 
> static void ccid_card_vscard_handle_init(
>@@ -282,7 +282,6 @@ static void ccid_card_vscard_read(void *opaque, const 
>uint8_t *buf, int size)
>         ccid_card_vscard_drop_connection(card);
>         return;
>     }
>-    assert(card->vscard_in_pos < VSCARD_IN_SIZE);
>     assert(card->vscard_in_hdr < VSCARD_IN_SIZE);
>     memcpy(card->vscard_in_data + card->vscard_in_pos, buf, size);
>     card->vscard_in_pos += size;
>-- 
>2.20.1
>

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Reply via email to