On 2019-02-13 17:24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 2/13/19 4:54 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> It's either "GNU *Library* General Public License version 2" or "GNU >> Lesser General Public License version *2.1*", but there was no "version >> 2.0" of the "Lesser" license. So assume that version 2.1 is meant here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]> >> --- >> crypto/block-luks.c | 2 +- >> crypto/block-luks.h | 2 +- >> crypto/block-qcow.c | 2 +- >> crypto/block-qcow.h | 2 +- >> crypto/block.c | 2 +- >> crypto/blockpriv.h | 2 +- >> crypto/cipher-builtin.c | 2 +- >> crypto/cipher-gcrypt.c | 2 +- >> crypto/cipher-nettle.c | 2 +- >> crypto/cipher.c | 2 +- >> crypto/hash-gcrypt.c | 2 +- >> crypto/hash-glib.c | 2 +- >> crypto/hash-nettle.c | 2 +- >> crypto/hash.c | 2 +- >> crypto/init.c | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgen-essiv.c | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgen-essiv.h | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgen-plain.c | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgen-plain.h | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgen-plain64.c | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgen-plain64.h | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgen.c | 2 +- >> crypto/ivgenpriv.h | 2 +- >> crypto/pbkdf-gcrypt.c | 2 +- >> crypto/pbkdf-nettle.c | 2 +- >> crypto/pbkdf-stub.c | 2 +- >> crypto/pbkdf.c | 2 +- >> crypto/random-gcrypt.c | 2 +- >> crypto/random-gnutls.c | 2 +- >> crypto/random-platform.c | 2 +- >> crypto/secret.c | 2 +- >> crypto/tlscreds.c | 2 +- >> crypto/tlscredsanon.c | 2 +- >> crypto/tlscredspriv.h | 2 +- >> crypto/tlscredspsk.c | 2 +- >> crypto/tlscredsx509.c | 2 +- >> crypto/tlssession.c | 2 +- >> crypto/xts.c | 2 +- >> include/crypto/block.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/cipher.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/hash.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/init.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/ivgen.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/pbkdf.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/random.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/secret.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/tlscreds.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/tlscredsanon.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/tlscredspsk.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/tlscredsx509.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/tlssession.h | 2 +- >> include/crypto/xts.h | 2 +- >> 52 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > > Still not convinced to use SPDX-License-Identifiers?
SPDX sounds fine to me personally, but so far nobody came up with a proper official description if and how this can legally be done, so until we are at that point, fixing the current statements sounds like the best solution to me. Thomas
