>> I think, the term "arch" is a little problematic in QEMU parlance. IMHO,
>> "target" should be used instead. ("arch" is used in Linux kernel community)> Naming things is hard, so this is a valid discussion. But, I have to > say that I also find "arch" in this context to be descriptive enough. This is not a "naming" problem, but a fundamental terminology convention used in QEMU. I am truly dissapointed that you chose to disrespect it. Aleksandar
