Hi Thomas,
On 1/28/19 9:37 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-01-27 11:18, kumar sourav wrote:
>> Sets the category of lm832x as DEVICE_CATEGORY_INPUT
>> Devices should be assigned to one of DEVICE_CATEGORY_XXXX
>>
>> Signed-off-by: kumar sourav <sourav.jb1...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> hw/input/lm832x.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/input/lm832x.c b/hw/input/lm832x.c
>> index cffbf586d4..07ae5e0aee 100644
>> --- a/hw/input/lm832x.c
>> +++ b/hw/input/lm832x.c
>> @@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ static void lm8323_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void
>> *data)
>> k->recv = lm_i2c_rx;
>> k->send = lm_i2c_tx;
>> dc->vmsd = &vmstate_lm_kbd;
>> + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_INPUT, dc->categories);
>> }
>
> This device already has DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC set since it is derived
> from TYPE_I2C_SLAVE. If you now set another category bit here, the
> device shows up twice in the output of "-device help". That's not so nice.
>
> I see multiple options here:
>
> 1) Drop this patch since the device already has a category
>
> 2) Make sure to clear_bit() the MISC category here again
>
> 3) Remove the set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC, k->categories) in
> hw/i2c/core.c - it does not make that much sense to set the
> MISC category for an abstract parent class.
>
> 4) Introduce a new DEVICE_CATEGORY_I2C which could be used
> instead of the DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC in hw/i2c/core.c
>
> One of the last two options sound most appealing to me.
Can we go with 0/3/4 together? 0 being this patch:
0) This devices inherited DEVICE_CATEGORY_I2C from his
abstract parent, also select the DEVICE_CATEGORY_INPUT
bit.
