On 03/11/11 15:55, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 08:54 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 03/11/11 15:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VNC
>>>> /* init remote displays */
>>>> if (vnc_display) {
>>>> vnc_display_init(ds);
>>>> @@ -3088,6 +3095,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>>>> printf("VNC server running on `%s'\n",
>>>> vnc_display_local_addr(ds));
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> +#endif
>>> So what ends up being the default display if VNC and SDL are both
>>> disabled? Have you tested this?
>> Then you cry :) actually you just don't get video output, a bit like if
>> you run with -nographic, except it doesn't try to force taking over
>> stdio. This is intentional btw :)
>
> Hrm, that doesn't sound very safe to me. Forcing -nographic would be
> better IMHO.
-nographic is bad, it forces a takeover of stdio preventing you from
running the monitor on stdio in this case. Not necessarily what you
want. We could do an alternative mode for this, but -nographic is not
what we want in this case.
Cheers,
Jes
