On 12/12/18 1:42 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > As this is all new work (so can't cause regressions) I'm starting the > patch series process with what we have so far. That way others can help > contribute and test. If anyone has strong feelings for missing functionality > let me know and we can work on adding that before this is merged.
I'd be ok merging this immediately after the bswap patches currently queued on my tcg-next-2 branch. Which for you just means defining TCG_TARGET_HAS_MEMORY_BSWAP to 0 and fixing the one MAINTAINERS entry. Anything else can be fixed or improved via normal development. r~
