On 06/12/18 17:15, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>
>> - for (j = 0; j < 256; j++) {
>> - uint32_t a = readl(s->memory.regions[i].guest_phys_addr + j*4);
>> + for (j = 0; j < 1024; j++) {
>> + uint32_t a = readb(s->memory.regions[i].guest_phys_addr + j);
> Can't you simply use memread() intead?Yes, I guess I could do memread + memcmp, but I wanted to change the code as little as possible here. Paolo
