On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 21:48:34 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> - 70/40% use rate for growing/shrinking the TLB does not
> seem a great choice, if one wants to avoid a pathological
> case that can induce constant resizing. Imagine we got
> exactly 70% use rate, and all TLB misses were compulsory
> (i.e. a direct-mapped TLB would have not prevented a
^^^
> single miss). We'd then double the TLB size:
I meant fully associative.
E.
