On Wed 26 Sep 2018 12:48:18 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote: > By the way, Berto: While reviewing this, I noticed that we don't make > use of the l2-cache-entry-size feature yet by default. I think you > said you wanted to do some more tests to find a good default > (intuitively, I'd expect it around MIN(cluster size, 64k), maybe 128k, > but of course this needs some benchmarking). Obviously, that's for a > separate series, though.
Yes, I was thinking about that yesterday after reviewing this series too... I don't know if I'll have a lot of time to test this, but I'll try. MIN(cluster_size, 64k) should be a good default probably. Berto
