On 09/08/2018 15:27, Emanuele wrote:
>
>>> +{
>>> + QSDHCI_PCI *spci = (QSDHCI_PCI *)obj;
>>> + qpci_device_enable(&spci->dev);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void sdhci_destroy(QOSGraphObject *obj)
>> "sdhci_pci_destructor()"?
> In general, I called the constructor name *_create, so in theory to
> keep it consistent the destructor should be *_destroy, no?
Yes, but the field name in QOSGraphObject is "destructor".
You have:
obj.get_device = XXX_get_device;
obj.get_driver = XXX_get_driver;
obj.start_hw = XXX_start_hw;
So we can expect:
obj.destructor = XXX_destructor;
Thanks,
Laurent
