On 09/08/2018 14:23, Emanuele wrote:
>> Perhaps we can call that "memory" rather than "guest_allocator", as it
>> gives access to the memory of the guest?
>> and qos_node_produces("x86_64/pc", "memory"); (or "guest_allocator")?
>>
>> and perhaps later, a qos_add_test("test-memory-allocator", "memory",
>> test_memory_allocator, NULL)?
> I don't know, is there a test for the memory allocator? I gave it that
No, I don't think so.
> name just because the actual structure representing it is called
> QGuestAllocator.
Yes, you can give the name you want, but for me "memory" sounds nicer
than "guest_allocator"...
Thanks,
Laurent
