On 26 June 2018 at 18:15, Auger Eric <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/26/2018 07:06 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 22 June 2018 at 14:22, Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> When running dtc on the guest /proc/device-tree, we get the >>> following warnings: "Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node <name> >>> has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name", with name: >>> /intc, /intc/its, /intc/v2m, /memory. >>> >>> This series removes those warnings by adding the unit address to >>> the corresponding node names. >> >> This didn't apply to my target-arm.next tree. Once I've >> applied my on-list arm pullreq to master, could you >> rebase it, please? > > Sure
Thanks. I'm being a bit lazy because the fixup probably isn't very complicated. The pullreq is now in master, so you can just rebase on that. thanks -- PMM
