Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]> writes: > Hi > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think we can bite off a digestible part of this series: >> target-independent top-level conditionals. I think that's PATCH >> 01-14,31 and applicable parts of 35-37. The idea is to merge that part >> quickly, then deal with the (less daunting) remainder. Marc-André, if >> you agree with that plan, please respin just that part. I can continue >> review of the remainder without a rebase. >> > > That's ok with me, I'll work on it. > thanks
Great! The next part could be target-dependend top-level conditionals, or member conditionals (enum members are tied to union variants, which may make further splitting impractical). This series does members first. I guess we stick to that order to avoid unnecessary patch reordering work.
