> -----Original Message----- > From: Farhan Ali [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 1:08 AM > To: Gonglei (Arei) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; longpeng > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/2] crypto/virtio-crypto: Register an algo only if it's > supported > > > > On 06/11/2018 04:48 AM, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Farhan Ali [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2018 3:09 AM > >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Gonglei (Arei) > >> <[email protected]>; longpeng <[email protected]>; > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected] > >> Subject: [RFC v1 2/2] crypto/virtio-crypto: Register an algo only if it's > supported > >> > >> From: Farhan Ali <[email protected]> > >> > >> Register a crypto algo with the Linux crypto layer only if > >> the algorithm is supported by the backend virtio-crypto > >> device. > >> > >> Also route crypto requests to a virtio-crypto > >> device, only if it can support the requested service and > >> algorithm. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c | 110 > >> ++++++++++++++++++--------- > >> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_common.h | 11 ++- > >> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_mgr.c | 81 > ++++++++++++++++++-- > >> 3 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c > >> b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c > >> index ba190cf..fef112a 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c > >> +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c > >> @@ -49,12 +49,18 @@ struct virtio_crypto_sym_request { > >> bool encrypt; > >> }; > >> > >> +struct virtio_crypto_algo { > >> + uint32_t algonum; > >> + uint32_t service; > >> + unsigned int active_devs; > >> + struct crypto_alg algo; > >> +}; > >> + > >> /* > >> * The algs_lock protects the below global virtio_crypto_active_devs > >> * and crypto algorithms registion. > >> */ > >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(algs_lock); > >> -static unsigned int virtio_crypto_active_devs; > >> static void virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_finalize_req( > >> struct virtio_crypto_sym_request *vc_sym_req, > >> struct ablkcipher_request *req, > >> @@ -312,13 +318,19 @@ static int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_setkey(struct > >> crypto_ablkcipher *tfm, > >> unsigned int keylen) > >> { > >> struct virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_ctx *ctx = > crypto_ablkcipher_ctx(tfm); > >> + uint32_t alg; > >> int ret; > >> > >> + ret = virtio_crypto_alg_validate_key(keylen, &alg); > >> + if (ret) > >> + return ret; > >> + > >> if (!ctx->vcrypto) { > >> /* New key */ > >> int node = virtio_crypto_get_current_node(); > >> struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto = > >> - virtcrypto_get_dev_node(node); > >> + virtcrypto_get_dev_node(node, > >> + VIRTIO_CRYPTO_SERVICE_CIPHER, alg); > >> if (!vcrypto) { > >> pr_err("virtio_crypto: Could not find a virtio device > >> in the > >> system\n"); > > > > We'd better change the above error message now. What about: > > " virtio_crypto: Could not find a virtio device in the system or > > unsupported > algo" ? > > > > Regards, > > -Gonglei > > > Sure, I will update the error message. But other than that does the rest > of the code looks good to you? > Yes, good work. You can add my ack in v2:
Acked-by: Gonglei <[email protected]> Regards, -Gonglei
