On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:53:36PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > kvm_cpu_exec/kvm_run, and start wondering "What needs to be done to > > upstream so that qemu-kvm could use that implementation?". If they > > differ, the reasons need to be understood and patched away, either by > > fixing/enhancing upstream or simplifying qemu-kvm. Once the upstream > > changes are merged back, a qemu-kvm patch is posted to switch to that > > version. > > while I'm not an expert in that area I really like you're approach. I'd > really prefer to let you finish up all the major work that way before > starting massive revamping like the glib main loop. Resolving the > qemu/qemu-kvm schisma surely is more important for the overall project > than rewriting existing functionality to look a little nicer.
Agree.
