On 05/09/2018 11:55 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <[email protected]>
---
tests/check-qdict.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
+static void qdict_stringify_for_keyval_test(void)
+{
+ QDict *dict = qdict_new();
+
+ /*
+ * Test stringification of:
+ *
+ * {
+ * "a": "null",
+ * "b": 42,
+ * "c": -23,
+ * "d": false,
+ * "e": null,
+ * "f": "",
+ * "g": 0.5,
+ * "h": 0xffffffffffffffff,
+ * "i": true,
+ * "j": 0
Is it worth testing fun things like '-0.0'?
+ g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "a"), "null"));
+ g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "b"), "42"));
+ g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "c"), "-23"));
+ g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "d"), "off"));
+ g_assert(qobject_type(qdict_get(dict, "e")) == QTYPE_QNULL);
Is it worth shortening this line to:
g_assert(qobject_to(QNull, qdict_get(dict, "e")));
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <[email protected]>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
