On 1 May 2018 at 19:04, Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > The first patch covers four related false positives. However, > we check the same condition twice and we certainly don't need > to that. Plus the assert might just help documentation-wise. > > The second patch covers dead code. I believe that Coverity is > right and that there are no paths that have !is_q at this point. > Add the assert to check that is true. > > The RISU tests that I ran over these insns came out clean. >
Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
