On 01/05/2018 10:59, Peter Maydell wrote: > As well as the SMMU, I'm also thinking about using the IOMMU > infrastructure for the v8M Memory Protection Controller > (though that is a bit trickier as I also need it to support > TCG execution in an IOMMU-controlled region, which is an > orthogonal bit of work to attribute support). > > Based-on: <20180430122404.10741-1-peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > ("memory.h: Improve IOMMU related documentation") but > only for textual reasons. > > v1->v2 changes: only adding the patch 1/12 that I forgot > to include in the v1 posting...
This is going to conflict with the MemoryRegionCache patches (review welcome :)), as they add a new function address_space_translate_iommu. But apart from this it seems like a no brainer. Paolo