On 06/02/2018 21:30, Roman Kagan wrote:
> +static SynICState *get_synic(X86CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + SynICState *synic =
> + SYNIC(object_resolve_path_component(OBJECT(cpu), "synic"));
> + assert(synic);
> + return synic;
> +}
> +
This is somewhat slow, maybe add the pointer to X86CPU?
> +void hyperv_synic_add(X86CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + Object *obj;
> +
> + obj = object_new(TYPE_SYNIC);
> + object_property_add_child(OBJECT(cpu), "synic", obj, &error_abort);
> + object_unref(obj);
> + object_property_set_bool(obj, true, "realized", &error_abort);
> +}
> +
> +void hyperv_synic_reset(X86CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + device_reset(DEVICE(get_synic(cpu)));
> +}
> +
> +void hyperv_synic_update(X86CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + synic_update(get_synic(cpu));
> +}
> +
Maybe rename to x86_cpu_hyperv_{add,get,reset,update}_synic?
Thanks,
Paolo
