On 2 November 2017 at 17:27, Kamil Rytarowski <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02.11.2017 17:55, Peter Maydell wrote: >> It's a shame the BSDs can't agree on a single way to implement this :-(
> It's better to assume that there is no such entity as a shared BSD code > in modern BSD Operating Systems. My opinion is to drop CONFIG_BSD > entirely from qemu and treat __NetBSD__, __FreeBSD__ and __OpenBSD__ as > diverse targets. Mmm, that's probably the best way to do it. (Better still, wherever possible check features rather than OS type). It does mean that more minor BSD variants like DragonFly are in a worse place, because nobody much is going to care about supporting them, and they can't get automatic support by being "like all of the others". thanks -- PMM
