On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Riku Voipio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:10:04AM -0700, Carlo Arenas wrote: >> some of the patches already have a Reviewed-by as shown by : >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/818378/ > > Can you send the series without the whitespace-only changes?
sure, but how would you suggest then to do the other changes which are the overall objective for this? * fix any incorrect values (mostly sparc, but there are also in all other archs incorrect names) * make sure that the arch specific file mirrors as much as possible linux headers, so it will be straightforward to update them (even possible through a script) * update the arch specific files with latest bits from 4.14 should I send those as independent series?, or just as additional patches in the series, so it is obvious what the dependency is. there is also the problem with the enum and related defines which was custom made and probably copy & pasted around Carlo
