On 2017-10-10 00:25, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/09/2017 04:55 PM, Max Reitz wrote: >> A qcow2 image file's length is not required to have a length that is a >> multiple of the cluster size. However, qcow2_refcount_area() expects an >> aligned value for its @start_offset parameter, so we need to round >> @old_file_size up to the next cluster boundary. >> >> Reported-by: pingl <[email protected]> > > Should we use a real name? My autocomplete when adding cc suggests Ping Li.
So does Red Hat's staff search. :-) I thought I'd just take the name from the BZ, so I'd be safe -- pleading the fact that real names are only required for S-o-bs. But well, why not. > (The upcoming git 2.15.0 adds my patch that auto-cc's anyone listed in > Reported-by, so we don't have to keep doing it manually: > https://github.com/git/git/commit/09ac6737 - but that doesn't help you > while you are still on 2.13.6) I like doing it manually because I don't like CC-ing only singular patches of a series, though -- at least not without CC-ing the cover letter, too. So far I was lucky enough not to get into a situation where I didn't want someone I wanted to CC on one patch not to see the whole series. (In this case here I don't think Red Hat QA gains much from seeing the upstream patch.) If I get unlucky in the future, I guess I'll have to extend my email sending script... >> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414049 >> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <[email protected]> >> --- >> block/qcow2.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <[email protected]> Thanks! Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
