>On 3 December 2010 13:36, <r...@afflict.kos.to> wrote: >> Collection of recent linux-user patches that have been >> tested to be good. Patches have been sent to the list before, >> lets have a couple of days for comments and I'll request a pull >> from. > >I hate to quibble, but: > >> Peter Maydell (10): >> target-arm: remove unused functions cpu_lock(), cpu_unlock() >> target-sparc: remove unused functions cpu_lock(), cpu_unlock() > >these aren't linux-user related, really...
Well, they kinda are. cpu_lock() was only ever used from linux-user code (IIRC) and the patches were trivial. But strictly speaking the patch would rather have been target-arm maintainers field. Riku
