On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Alistair Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > Instead of using the hardcoded (MemTxAttrs){0} for no memory attributes > let's use the already defined MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED macro instead. > > This is technically a change of behaviour as MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED sets > the unspecified field to 1, but it doesn't look like anything is > checking this field. > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <[email protected]> > --- > V2: > - Update commit message to indicate the change in behaviour > > target/xtensa/op_helper.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Max Filippov <[email protected]> -- Thanks. -- Max
